首页> 外文OA文献 >Role of ultrasound and color Doppler imaging in the detection of carotid paragangliomas.
【2h】

Role of ultrasound and color Doppler imaging in the detection of carotid paragangliomas.

机译:超声和彩色多普勒成像在检测颈动脉旁神经节瘤中的作用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

INTRODUCTION:\udCarotid body paragangliomas (PGLs) are highly vascularized lesions that arise from the paraganglia located at the carotid bifurcation.\udPURPOSE:\udTo evaluate the usefulness of gray-scale ultrasound (US) and color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) in the detection and follow-up of carotid PGLs of the neck.\udMATERIALS AND METHODS:\udThe authors retrospectively reviewed US and CDUS examinations of the neck performed in 40 patients with PGL syndrome type 1 and single or bilateral neck PGLs confirmed by CT or MRI; the patients had a total of 60 PGLs of the neck. US and CDUS outcome was compared to the outcome of second-line imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). The following findings were considered: presence/absence of focal lesions at US imaging and difference in maximum diameter of the lesion measured at US and MRI/CT. Results were compared using the Student's -test.\udRESULTS:\udOf the 60 PGLs of the neck only 5 (8.3%) were not visualized at US or CDUS examination. The difference in maximum diameter of these lesions measured at CT/MRI and US/CDUS ranged between -5 mm and +16 mm (mean difference 2.2 ± 6.0). This difference was statistically significant ( = 0.008).\udCONCLUSIONS:\udUS and CDUS are useful methods for identifying carotid PGLs also measuring less than 10 mm in diameter. However, diagnostic accuracy of US and CDUS is reduced in the measurement of the exact dimensions of the lesions.
机译:简介:\ ud颈动脉旁神经节瘤(PGL)是位于颈动脉分叉旁神经节的高度血管化病变。\ ud目的:\ ud评估灰度超声(US)和彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)在检测中的有效性\ ud材料与方法:\ ud作者回顾性回顾了40例1型PGL综合征和CT或MRI证实的单侧或双侧颈部PGL的美国和CDUS颈部检查。患者的颈部共有60个PGL。将US和CDUS结果与诸如磁共振成像(MRI)或计算机断层扫描(CT)等二线成像技术的结果进行了比较。考虑以下发现:在US成像处是否存在局灶性病变以及在US和MRI / CT处测得的病变最大直径的差异。结果使用\ student's测试进行比较。\ ud结果:\ ud在US或CDUS检查中,只有5个(8.3%)的PGL未显示。在CT / MRI和US / CDUS上测得的这些病变的最大直径差异在-5 mm至+16 mm之间(平均差异2.2±6.0)。该差异具有统计学意义(= 0.008)。\ ud结论:\ udUS和CDUS是识别直径小于10毫米的颈动脉PGL的有用方法。但是,US和CDUS的诊断准确性会降低病变的确切尺寸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号